Best Large-Capacity Microwave
$ 262.66 at Amazon
Reading: Best Microwaves of 2022
Power: 1250 Watts | Size: 2.2 cu. ft.
evening heating good with frozen foods excellent at defrosting Takes up enough of counter space 1250 Watts |2.2 copper. foot. If you are person who not only is looking for the best of the best when it comes to microwaves but besides one of the largest options out there, then we would be distressed to recommend a better choice than the Panasonic NN-SN936. This giant appliance not only offers an enormous capacity but pairs that with top-tier performance. It heats food very evenly and does well at defrosting .
unfortunately, this microwave did n’t do the best with the freeze burrito, failing to heat the center field above the want temperature. It besides did n’t have the most comprehensive examination adjust of appliance features. however, this is still one of our all-around favorite microwaves and one that we powerfully recommend .
Read review: Panasonic NN-SN936
This is one of our favored overall microwaves we have tested to go steady. credit rating : Laura Casner
Best Small-Capacity Microwave
$ 120 list
Power: 900 Watts | Size: 0.9 cu. ft.
very good at freeze foods full at defrosting user-friendly flying features lackluster with leftovers 900 Watts |0.9 copper. foot. The Kenmore 70919 packs a fortune of punch into a little software. It performs impressively well across the board with an particularly impressive operation on frozen food and defrosting frozen kernel, delivering some of the best results we ‘ve seen. On top of its leading performance, the Kenmore is very easy to use. Its quick-start buttons, like the 30-second cook or popcorn preset, make using this device a breeze, and the bright light makes it easy to keep an eye on your food while it ‘s cook .
While the Kenmore offers amazing results, there were still some inconsistencies. This model creates some temperature gradients in food when spanned across the turntable. Food items placed in the kernel of the turntable heat astir more than food items that sit closer to the circumference. broadly speaking, it is not the most brawny option out there either, but we were pleasantly surprised with the impressive results this compact appliance yielded. however, we heartily recommend the Kenmore to anyone denounce for a top-tier option with a smaller footprint .
Read review: Kenmore 70919
This appliance delivered one of the top overall performances. credit : Laura Casner
Best Bang for Your Buck
Amazon Basics Microwave 0.7
$ 74.99 at Amazon
Power: 700 Watts | Size: 0.7 cu. ft.
Great for freeze burrito very compress cheap low baron 700 Watts |0.7 copper. foot. For a microwave with a price a small as its footprint, check out the Amazon Basics Microwave 0.7. This budget-friendly option performs admirably across all our metrics. Despite its low power end product, it heats pre-prepared freeze items with relief. It is simpleton and slowly to use, with the add benefit of being compatible with Alexa-enabled smart home devices .
We noticed some hot spots in our inflame map test, and food takes longer to heat up in this smaller, less knock-down option. Its interface, while by and large user-friendly, requires some getting used to. The Alexa-enabled smart family capabilities besides require some extra apparatus, and some of our testers wondered if it ‘s worth the hassle. All in all, this offer from Amazon Basics is one of our top suggestions to anyone looking for a more economic choice .
Read review: Amazon Basics Microwave 0.7
This Amazon Basics option is a bang-up choice for smaller kitchens. credit : Laura Casner
Best for Even Heating of Frozen Foods
$ 219.95 at Amazon
Power: 800 Watts | Size: 0.9 cu. ft.
bang-up with freeze foods Consistent and even heating More expensive indifferent defrost 800 Watts |0.9 copper. foot. If you want a kitchen appliance that delivers top performance on freeze foods, look no further than the Panasonic NN-SN67KS. It delivered the best performance in two of our three frozen food tests and tied for 2nd place in the third. It besides stood out on one thing that can make microwave use frustrating : odd heat, where one function of the item is however cold, and other parts are steaming hot. The Panasonic left the competition in the dust on our Heat Map test, which measures consistent and even heating system of foods and earned the clear score on heating overall .
surprisingly, this Panasonic microwave delivered below-average performance defrosting kernel, despite it being the lead performer on heating frozen foods. It is besides premium priced, which may give some consumers pause before buying. But, if you are looking for a microwave that ‘s perfective for freeze foods and delivers more evening heating across your food items, the Panasonic NN-SN67KS is a arrant choice .
Read review: Panasonic NN-SN67KS
The Panasonic NN-SN67KS is larger and premium-priced, but it delivers especial heat and freeze food performance. It is n’t identical portable ; it takes quite a lot of force to slide this microwave about even on satiny countertops. credit : Laura Casner
Read more: Microwave Corn on the Cob
Best for Defrosting
Power: 1100 Watts | Size: 1.2 cu. ft.
capital at defrosting Easy to use good for freeze foods Higher price 1100 Watts |1.2 copper. foot. If you ‘re on the hunt for a full-sized, high-end microwave that excels at defrosting, we recommend checking out the Toshiba EM131A5C first. This appliance performs well across all our metrics, yielding specially exceptional results when defrosting. It defrosts without cook, which can be a grandiloquent order for most microwaves, making this a great choice for those who frequently keep frigid kernel on handwriting. The EM131A5C besides has no problem heating freeze meals quickly, and the user-friendly interface is chockablock of commodious presets, making tasks like this hassle-free .
While this quick kitchen appliance will have your dinner warmed up in no clock time, it falls a fiddling abruptly in heating our food evenly ( an publish we found with about every microwave tested ). This by and large occurs when there are different types of food being heated at once, such as a plate of leftovers or even a slice of pizza, as the cheese heats improving a lot faster than the crust. It is besides larger and a bit more expensive than some of its competitors, but if you have a few extra bucks to spend on a high-quality product, we do n’t think you ‘ll be let down .
Read review: Toshiba EM131A5C
This model is one of our all-time favorites in this class of products. credit rating : Laura Casner
select up to 5 products to compare
|76||Panasonic NN-SN936B||$250||If you are searching for a top-tier microwave with plenty of capacity, then this is hard to beat|
|72||Kenmore 70919||$120||This is a great top-tier option for anyone with a smaller kitchen|
|69||Toshiba EM131A5C||$170||This appliance is a fantastic choice for anyone predominantly heating up frozen foods and seeking a larger model|
|68||Panasonic NN-SN67KS||$220||This product was the top performer for heating frozen foods, and is one of the best for heating food items evenly and consistently|
|65||Amazon Basics Microwave 0.7||$75||An affordable option with good performance for those with smaller kitchens|
|64||Panasonic NN-SB458S||$110||A middle of the road product for a reasonable price, but we weren’t exceptionally wowed by any aspect of this microwave|
|61||Toshiba EM925A5A||$115||This model stood out for its ease of use and great performance with frozen foods, but performed poorly at defrosting|
|61||Black+Decker EM031MB11||$120||While this appliance did alright in our rankings, it just didn’t match the performance of some of the better models|
|58||Nostalgia RMO4AQ||$170||If this is your aesthetic, you may be willing to look past the average overall cooking performance offered by this model|
|54||Black+Decker EM720CB7||$90||All in all, this appliance didn’t deliver very impressive results, failing to earn it a recommendation from us|
|50||Breville the Compact Wave||$200||While it looks great, we found it hard to rectify the so-so performance with the top-tier price tag|
|48||Galanz 0.7 Retro||$79||While it has a very eye-catching appearance, it didn’t score terribly well overall in our tests|
We put each microwave through a gauntlet of more than 72 individual performance tests to find the best. accredit : Laura Casner
Why You Should Trust Us
Our testing team of Austin Palmer and David Wise has extensive feel with kitchen appliances, including testing more than 250 products for GearLab ranging from juicers and food processors to ice cream makers and blenders. Throughout the testing process, both Austin, David, and the rest of the GearLab team became frozen food connoisseurs, consuming army for the liberation of rwanda more hot Pockets, mini-lasagnas, and frozen burritos than anyone possibly should .
Our microwave testing is divided across four rating metrics:
- Heating tests (40% of overall score weighting)
- Frozen Foods tests (30% weighting)
- Defrosting tests (20% weighting)
- Ease of Use tests (10% weighting)
Our microwave examination is divided across four fink metrics : We ‘ve purchased and tested over 25 different microwaves over the final five years. We conduct across-the-board neck and neck tests and have a group of judges evaluate the quality of the heated food. We objectively compare how efficiently each appliance can heat the desire detail by measuring the temperatures across food and liquids with multiple digital thermometers and a laser infrared thermometer. We used the products in our office and personal kitchens over multiple months to see how they perform over a longer period and how easily they function in a real-world kitchen .
We subjected this fleet of microwaves to 162 individual tests to pace performance. The most emphasis was placed on the Heating tests, which corresponds to 40 % of each product ‘s total grade. We broke that metric function depressed into five specific tests that include heat map and the rate at which each product heated food. We besides placed a significant sum of scoring slant on how well each microwave could heat fixed foods .
Analysis and Test Results
For the 12 microwaves we tested, we split our cortege of testing assessments into four burden metrics : heating, freeze foods, defrosting, and relief of use. Each metric function includes a kind of different tests, with the performance of each merchandise detailed in the sections below. Remember to consider what you typically use a microwave for and what aspects matter most to you as you read through our metrics and scores .
When you pay more for a microwave, you ‘ll much get a more powerful unit that heats food quickly and has more commodious ( AKA more specific ) functions. If you ‘re on a budget, one product stands out well above the rest : the Amazon Basics 0.7. It is substantially more low-cost than many of the other contenders even even holds its own when it comes to performance. It ‘s besides quite a bite smaller, so it may take slenderly longer to heat food, but it ‘s hard to beat when it comes to the price .
The high-end Panasonic NN-SN67KS delivers top heat performance and heats up food very evenly. credit : Laura Casner
Heating performance is of fundamental importance to your day-to-day use of, and satisfaction with, a microwave oven. So, it is no surprise that we gave Heating a full 40% of the overall score weighting. To rate microwaves on heating, we challenged each product with five different tests:
- Heating Map test (35% of Heating score weighting)
- Heating Speed test (20% weighting)
- Leftover Heating test (15% weighting)
- Soup Heating test (15% weighting)
- Pizza Heating test (15% weighting)
Heating performance is of cardinal importance to your daily consumption of, and satisfaction with, a microwave oven. indeed, it is no surprise that we gave Heating a full 40 % of the overall score slant. To rate microwaves on inflame, we challenged each intersection with five unlike tests : The standout performer in our heat metric was the Panasonic NN-SN936 on heat was the high-end Panasonic NN-SN67KS, which led the means or tied for the top-tier position in the bulk of our heating system assessments. The Toshiba EM925A5A and the lower monetary value Panasonic model NN-SB458S besides delivered strong heat operation, but unlike the top-end Panasonic, neither was above average when it came to even heating .
credit : Laura Casner
The worst performer in our heating test was the retro-looking Nostalgia RMO4AQ, which heated foods raggedly, leaving excessively many hot and cold areas. The Galanz Retro and the Breville The Compact Wave came cheeseparing but performed equitable a bantam bite better than the Nostalgia .
The Nostalgia may add a fun ex post facto front to your countertop, but be mindful that it was the worst performer in our heat tests. credit : Laura Casner
Heating Map Test
Our heat map test rates the consistency of heating across a wide area of the microwave. To perform this test, we spread an even level of Kraft Jet-Puffed Marshmallow creme on parchment composition, cut out a disk the size of the turntable, and then heated it on senior high school for 2 minutes. We scored each product based on the consistency of temperature and browning. The products that scored best created an even amount of heating across the entire disk of marshmallow bagatelle. Poor performers had hot and cold spots, which are visually apparent on the marshmallow creme surface. We besides looked at the bottom of the magnetic disk, which was visible through the parchment newspaper .
The high-end Panasonic model, the Panasonic NN-SN936, achieved the best leave in our estrus function quiz. We found minimal marshmallow temperature variation and no distinct blistering spot .
Poor performers in the estrus map trial include the Nostalgia which left the inner ring hardly cooked at all, while the outer ring was about sunburn. similarly, the lower-cost Toshiba model, the Toshiba EM121A5C had a center ring that gets super-heated compared to the rest of the disk .
Heating Speed Test
To test heating speed, we put a 125 milliliter beaker of urine in the center of the oven, then heated it on high for 45 seconds. This allowed us to measure the temperature ascent, from the starting temp ( room temperature ) to the temperature after 45 seconds of heating .
The high-end Toshiba EM131A5C and the Panasonic NN-SN936 both outpaced the rest in heating speed, raising the water temperature over 110 degrees Fahrenheit, a full 25 % higher than any early oven. The slowest heat operation was by the affordably-priced Amazon Basics 0.7, merely boosting the temperature by 70.1 degrees Fahrenheit .
For our Heating Speed test, we measured how much the temperature increased in 124mL of water system when heated for 45 seconds on high. credit : Laura Casner
Heating leftovers was the one test where the lowest-cost products shined. The low-end Panasonic intersection, the Panasonic NN-SB458S, did the best with the mix plate of leftovers, heating all three types of food fairly evenly, an true difficult tax for a microwave. Tied for 2nd locate was the value-priced Amazon Basics 0.7, the Galanz Retro, the Panasonic NN-SN936, and the low-end Toshiba .
Some storm and notably poor people performances on Leftovers came from the Toshiba EM131A5C and Panasonic NN-SN67KS. Despite doing very well across many tests across the metrics and landing at the top of the voltaic pile overall, these models failed to achieve coherent heating results with this evaluation .
The AmazonBasics scored near the top in our leftover heating test. All three types of food were warm adequate to eat after the inflame bicycle, though the sausage was a piece warmer than the veggies. accredit : Laura Casner
All the products did an acceptable caper heating soup, but this was another test where the Amazon Basics was tied for inaugural place in our tests. The Toshiba ovens and the Panasonic NN-SN936 besides performed very well in our soup tests, sharing the beginning place status with the Amazon Basics .
We heated two slices of leftover pizza in each microwave, checking to see which models could heat them evenly and thoroughly. This test accounted for 15 % of the Heating system of measurement .
If you love pizza, keep the Panasonic NN-SN67KS at the top of your number. This model not alone excelled with fixed foods but was one of the top scorers at reheating pizza .
Both slices of pizza came out of the Panasonic quite evenly heated. credit : Laura Casner
conversely, the Panasonic NN-SB458S, performed the worst in the pizza test, unevenly heating the slices, with one being nowhere near hot enough to eat and the early slither exhibiting hot and cold spots .
The Panasonic NN-SN67KS offers unmatched operation heating system freeze foods, although it was curiously under average at defrosting frozen kernel. credit : Laura Casner
Our future series of tests focused on how well each of these products could heat premade frigid food items, such as Hot Pockets, mini-lasagnas, or freeze burritos. We followed the manufacturers ‘ instructions for reheat, adjusting for the power floor of each model when necessary. We used a power system of instant-read kitchen thermometers to compare how evenly heated each while of food was to determine the scores .
Of all the products we tested, the Panasonic NN-SN67KS stand out when heating prepared frigid foods. This appliance did an excellent subcontract with all three types of frigid foods, producing an average temperature dispute of 10 degrees Fahrenheit or less between zones .
The center came out a morsel warmer than the edges during our hotness screen of the Panasonic NN-SN67KS. credit : Laura Casner
The Kenmore 70919 and the Toshiba EM925A5A closely followed, both performing closely a well. These products delivered about arrant results with the Hot Pockets and heated our burrito evenly. however, they showed a piece more of a temperature spread with the mini-lasagna, particularly the Toshiba EM925A5A, which left an average temperature dispute of 23 degrees Fahrenheit .
One side of the lasagna was quite a bite cool than the middle and early side during our inflame quiz of the AmazonBasics Microwave 0.7. credit rating : Laura Casner
The bulk of our test suite — the Amazon Basics 0.7, the Black+Decker EM031MB11, the Nostalgia RMO4AQ, the Panasonic NN-SB458S, and the Toshiba EM131A5C — all lagged behind the top performers. These underperformers all did decently well with the Hot Pocket and the freeze burrito but average or below with the lasagna .
The Breville, the Galanz Retro, and the Panasonic NN-SN936 all did decently well with the Hot Pocket and the person lasagna but struggled with the freeze burrito, all failing to heat it sufficiently to serve based on the manufacturer ‘s management .
The lasagna had identical little temperature variation. credit : Matt Spencer
Of these products, the Nostalgia RMO4AQ was the least impressive, showing an average temperature variation of 43 degrees Fahrenheit between zones. The rest of the group ranged between 15 and 30 degrees Fahrenheit .
The bankroll of turkey, cook to be defrosted in the Toshiba EM925A5A. credit : Jenna Ammerman
Our defrosting metric function is based on the results of a one screen : defrosting a one-pound pulley of fixed land turkey. We ran a defrost bicycle for that weight of food based on the instructions for each model, then based scores on the come of turkey that was successfully defrosted after the screen, noting if any was prematurely cooked .
The Toshiba EM131A5C led the means, absolutely defrosting the integral block of kernel without cooking any of it in a little under 10 minutes. This microwave besides beeps halfway through to alert you to flip the meat over .
The Toshiba EM131A5C defrosted the entire block of turkey. credit : Laura Casner
The Black+Decker EM720CB7, the Panasonic NN-SN936, and the Kenmore 70919 came next, with the Black+Decker and the Panasonic defrosting about 12 ounces of joker and the Kenmore defrost just under 11 ounces. The remaining turkey broke apart reasonably easily tied if it was placid a small freeze, and we would n’t have any consequence tossing it directly in a pan after taking it out of either of these models. The Nostalgia RMO4AQ narrowly followed, marked polish because it ended up cooking a bantam snatch of the turkey during the defrost work .
The Panasonic NN-SB458S defrosted approximately nine ounces of the joker, but the remainder was barely freeze and crumbled easily. The Galanz Retro and the Breville performed similarly. The Amazon Basics 0.7 performed similarly, but the residual frozen parts were still quite solid and would be a fight to break apart without far defrost. The remaining microwaves all delivered lackluster results, not merely leaving a boastfully freeze chunk of turkey but besides cooking sections in the process .
The Toshiba EM131A5C does a big job with premade fixed items. credit : Laura Casner
Ease of Use
Our final set of tests assessed the user-friendliness of these kitchen appliances. We looked at the different preset features and one-touch buttons, equally well as the home lighting and whether they were prone to sliding around on a counter when you opened and closed the door or pushed a button .
Both the Toshiba EM131A5C and the Toshiba EM925A5A impressed us with their overall relief of use. They do n’t slide about and polish enough of light at heart. Their popcorn buttons were reasonably thoroughly at correctly popping popcorn. They both have +30 seconds buttons and one-touch quick start functions for one to six minutes. however, their standalone kitchen timers can be slightly finical .
The Toshiba EM925A5A is convenient and easy to use. credit : Laura Casner
The Black+Decker EM031MB11 and the Kenmore 70919 have all the one-touch features you would typically want, but both slide around a snatch on crafty surfaces. They feature properly lighting, but the preset popcorn feature was n’t perplex, peculiarly the Kenmore ‘s. The Breville scored similarly overall, having better lighting and popcorn functions but we did n’t find its quick buttons to be as commodious .
The Amazon Basics 0.7, the Black+Decker EM720CB7, and the Panasonic NN-SN67KS were each hampered by a few flaws that we believe make these products less commodious to use. The Amazon Basics 0.7 did very well in the popcorn preset test and is rock-solid on most countertops, but the +30 seconds button requires you to hit it twice, and this appliance ‘s internal lighting is only acceptably. The Alexa integration can besides make it easier or harder to use, depending on how you feel about fresh home systems .
The AmazonBasics Microwave 0.7 gives you the choice to integrate with your smart home. accredit : Laura Casner
Read more: Microwave Corn on the Cob
We liked the interface on the Black+Decker EM720CB7, but the entire appliance slid around some when we opened or closed the door. It fared ill in the popcorn test, leaving tons of un-popped kernels behind after the preset meter elapsed. conversely, the Panasonic NN-SN67KS deliver excellent popcorn results and remained securely in plaza when pushed. however, it lacks some one-touch features we like to see .
recognition : Laura Casner
We sincerely hope that you have found this review to be both helpful and informative. If it has made it a little easier to find your perfect new microwave, we’ve done our job. We’re confident that there’s something out there to match your needs and budget.
We sincerely hope that you have found this recapitulation to be both helpful and instructive. If it has made it a little easier to find your perfect newly microwave, we ‘ve done our speculate. We ‘re confident that there ‘s something out there to match your needs and budget .